5 Lazy Art Habits (Webcartoonists Seriously Need to Break)
With the introduction of comic-hosting sites such as Keenspot and the cheapness of domains and webhosting these days, it seems everybody who thinks they can draw have tried making their own webcomic. Not everyone may be great at it, but you have to admire the ones who stick through it and update when they say they’ll update (for example, NOT 99.9% of them). Drawing a new comic every day/week/whatever is difficult. If the artist wants to take some time-saving shortcuts in their artwork, can you really hold it against them?
Yes. Yes you can. Without further ado, here are 5 lazy shortcuts too many webcartoonists take.
1) “Hiding” hard-to-draw body parts.
Every novice artist knows that hands and feet are hard to get right. But if you want to draw your characters as anything more complex than stick figures, you’re going to have to make several hands in the course of your comic. But wait, couldn’t so much time be saved if you simply figured out a way to not have to draw those pesky extremities?
The solution, many seem to come to, is to use as many word bubbles and objects as possible to cover up hands and feet. Artists seem to think that nobody is going to notice that big chunk of word-wall blocking part of the image.

None shall be the wiser!
There is really no excuse for this, no matter how self-conscious the artist is about their hands. Skills only get better with practice; trying to hide the issue wont solve it and makes what could have been an otherwise good-looking panel ugly.
This Chainsawsuit strip sums it up best:
2) Copypasta.
While reading a webcomic, have you ever noticed two panels that look suspiciously similar to each other? If so, you’ve just eaten a big helping of Copypasta in lazysauce.
If you’re not making a sprite comic, you shouldn’t pretend you are. Artists use this to shave at least 25% off of the time it takes to make the particular strip, but it noticeably comes off as odd-looking. Nobody stands 100% still while they talk. Making your characters do it gives an uncanny valley quality to them. Take the extra time to draw out each panel and keep your hands off of ctrl+c, ctrl+v. Your readers will be much more impressed.
3) Photo backgrounds.
This one is debatable. Some comics don’t use any background at all. Is it really worse to throw a photo background into the panel rather than give it none at all but a solid color?
In my opinion, yes it is. If you really want to portray a specific scene, it should match the feel of the rest of your artwork. A photoshop blur on a photo behind your characters stands out against the art too much and breaks the suspension of disbelief. In other words, seeing the photo background only reminds me of the fact that I’m reading a comic drawn by a lazy artist who didn’t want to draw the background he wanted.
4) Characters of inconsistent proportions.
Some artists seem to have problems keeping their characters’ heads and limbs the same size in proportion to their bodies across strips, or worse, even across panels in the same strip.

Also, see habit #1.
This happens when the artist never took the effort to create a character design sheet, showing the exact proportions of a character for future reference. Use guidelines while drawing if you have to, just make sure that your art is consistent.
5) Insta-Redesign™.
This happens when the artist arbitrarily decides to redesign one of their characters. They break out the handy, dandy Insta-Redesign™! It slices! It dices! It transforms the body of your character! Apply directly to the forehead!
It’s only natural for your characters’ designs to change over time as your artistic skill improves. But for god sake, don’t do a “magic transformation” strip in which your character magically changes his or her appearance at once. It’s been done to death.
I know there are already many webcomic reviews stating basically the same things that I have, plus many more. If adding mine to the pool helps prevent even one webcomic artist from doing any of the things above, I’ll consider it worthwhile to have written this.




December 4th, 2009 at 7:02 am
I agree with all of these but the last. When an artist is going to make a change it would be difficult to do so gradually if they already know what the finished product is going to look like.
In the case presented above, Scott Kurtz decided to show that Francis and Marcy had started to grow up and used the “Level Up” thing as the vehicle. While I am not an artist (and thus can be blown off appropriately as a heretic if you want) I am a reader and find that a clever transition is better than one that is unexplained and sudden.
Copypata, though? Ugh.
December 5th, 2009 at 8:23 am
You have a lot of good points but I have to disagree with number 2. I think it depends on what the strip is trying to do. I believe if anything, it is more efficient to copy and paste the same picture if it is trying to convey the point. You also run into the problem of redrawing the same picture. Artists come with a wide range of skills but may have a harder time drawing a copy exactly. Considering how the net is, if something looks off, you will have everyone pointing it out.
This is simply my 2 cents. I look forward to further updates!
~Julian
December 5th, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Hey guys, thanks for the comments.
Dave,
I see what you mean. This may be more to do with storytelling than artwork, but I know the Insta-Redesign CAN be used as the vehicle for character progress. However, Scott Kurtz has used this vehicle more than once, in 4th-wall breaking “The artist decided to redraw you!” form. Perhaps this is the example I should have shown in the first place: http://www.pvponline.com/2001/03/05/mon-mar-05/
Julian,
I agree that moderate, careful use of copy-pasting is acceptable, but I was referring to taking it to its extreme, showing characters in the exact same position over multiple panels with barely a mouth movement.
Examples:
http://www.pvponline.com/2004/07/11/sun-jul-11/
http://www.timeslikethis.com/comix/2009/11/23.html
In the CAD example in the article, I feel that having the exact same frame in those two panels breaks the “standing still while talking” rule. The character behaves like a robot, which I don’t believe was supposed to be the intention. At the very least, Tim Buckley could have split the image into two panels, the character “looking” at one side of his inventory in each frame. I think this is a much more acceptable use:
http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/d/20080915.html
The repeated panel is not used for any dialog, simply as a “beat” to lengthen the moment exaggerating the character’s shock.
December 10th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
I completely agree with #5.
I’ve seen it used when
– The artist is not capable of changing a character’s looks over time (requires planning and methodical work)
– The artist thinks of a really funny arc, but it requires older characters, so they don’t have time to do the gradual change
– Someone calls them on their 5 year old strip with a youth that never ages and they must decide whether they are sticking with ageless charlie brown or going to grow their characters.
In this particular case there’s a little bit of everything. He covered it up by making a joke about leveling up, but it still doesn’t fit with the world he created.
The bottom line is that it’s a gimmick to suit the artist, and generally doesn’t fit in with the strip.
January 19th, 2010 at 7:24 pm
Alright, you caught me.
I do admit that my using photo backgrounds are a cop-out/shortcut thing. But it’s more a matter of trying to get a comic done in the limited time I have in my busy day-to-day life than laziness, just to clarify. Besides, I’ve got plenty other more important things to be lazy about.
April 26th, 2010 at 12:18 am
Hey Thomas, sorry for not replying sooner, admittedly I forgot all about your comment until I saw it again just now.
I hope you didn’t take my criticism too personal, I’m still a fan of TLT
I understand it is a time saver, better to do what you have to do to get it done than not finish it on time. Just sayin’ it would be more impressive hand-drawn lol.
Thanks for commenting and clarifying your side of the story!
-DT